The International Comparative Legal Guide – Corporate Tax 2019 – Hong Kong

Vivien Teu & Co LLP is delighted to have contributed the Hong Kong chapter of The International Comparative Legal Guide: Vivien Teu & Co LLP_Hong Kong_Corporate Tax 2019.

The Guide is published by Global Legal Group in association with William Watson of Slaughter and May, covering common issues in corporate tax laws and regulations – including capital gain, overseas profits, real estate, anti-avoidance, BEPS and the digital economy – in 34 jurisdictions.

The Full Guide is free to access: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/corporate-tax-laws-and-regulations

New Hong Kong Regulatory Approach to Virtual Assets

The Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission (SFC) today issued a statement and an accompanying circular setting out a new regulatory approach on virtual assets, referred to as a “digital representation of value” (encompassing “cryptocurrency”, “crypto-assets” or “digital token”).

The statement outlines the SFC’s new measures to regulate investment or portfolio management or distribution of investment products that involve investing in virtual assets, including licensing conditions that could apply irrespective of whether the virtual assets meet the definition of “securities” or “futures contract” (licensing requirements for engaging in type 1 regulated activity of dealing in securities and/or for engaging in type 9 regulated activity of asset management could apply).

It is intended to address risks that virtual assets pose to investors, and to “encourage the responsible use of technologies and also provide investors with better choices and better outcomes”, in the words of Mr Ashley Alder, the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer.

This may be seen as the SFC taking needed cautious measures on a new risky asset class, bringing virtual assets clearly within its regulatory scope.

At the same time, the SFC has introduced a conceptual framework for the potential regulation of virtual asset trading platform operators”. According to the SFC, the new regulatory framework is intended as a “conceptual framework to explore a pathway for compliance for virtual trading platform operators who are willing to be supervised by us”.

As such, the framework could be a welcomed and strategic step for Hong Kong in the growing virtual and digital assets world. The SFC conceptual framework lays down the core principles and expected platform and trading terms and conditions that shall apply, for exploring virtual trading platforms in SFC regulatory sandbox environment.

The key principles include requiring all virtual asset trading activities to be conducted under a single legal entity and compliance with all applicable requirements by the entire virtual asset trading business, and that the services of virtual trading platform operator should be provided only to “professional investors”.

Recently, the SFC has launched a new logo of a soaring eagle, which may suggest a lift-off to a new era, while the SFC emphasises its unceasing vigilance on new risks.

To discuss this subject matter, please contact:

Vivien Teu (Email: vivien.teu@vteu.co; Tel:+852 2969 5316)

Links to:

Statement on regulatory framework for virtual asset portfolio managers, fund distributors and trading platform operators

Circular to intermediaries – Distribution of virtual asset funds

Regulatory Standards for lincensed corporations managing virtual asset portfolios

Conceptual framework for the potential regulation of virtual asset trading platform operators

Hong Kong SFC increasing focus on Green Finance and ESG

At a recent luncheon with the Hong Kong Investment Funds Association, Ashley Alder, Chief Executive Officer of the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), gave an update on the SFC’s strategy for the Hong Kong asset management industry.

Besides reflecting on where things are on the key initiatives of the SFC in recent years – namely the mutual recognition of funds arrangements, retail fund distribution, ETF connect, the newly introduced open-ended fund company structure and the ongoing review of the Code on Unit Trusts, formal references were made to green finance and investing with ESG factors.

As stated in the speech:

“Investors increasingly recognise that strong environment, social and governance (ESG) standards are a proxy for overall management quality and long-term sustainability. Companies with high ESG standards are likely [to] have less exposure to environmental accidents or regulatory breaches which could impose significant costs and harm their brand reputation or other intangible assets.”

“At the same time, many studies have now found that ESG factors actually boost risk adjusted returns, and at worst only have a neutral impact.”

“Growing interest in the area has created a situation where more investors want in, but there is a lack of truly sustainable investment opportunities.”

In this context, it is noteworthy from the speech that the following are key areas the SFC is looking at:

  • Potentially mandating environmental disclosures by listed companies, following the footsteps of Mainland China where such requirements are expected to be introduced in 2020; this is aimed to enhance quality and comparability of ESG data from companies for investment decisions by asset managers;
  • Examining asset manager’s integration of ESG factors into the investment processes, and disclosure of the methodology to investors;
  • Developing consistent disclosures and labelling guidelines for green investment products.

Read the full speech here:

https://www.sfc.hk/web/EN/files/ER/PDF/Speeches/Ashley_20180919.pdf

Hong Kong Open-ended Fund Company Comes into Effect

Pursuant to the Gazette published on 27 July 2018, the Securities and Futures (Amendment) Ordinance 2016 enacted to amend the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) comes into effect on 30 July 2018, along with subsidiary legislations[1] issued in May 2018 including the Securities and Futures (Open-ended Fund Companies) Rules (OFC Rules), and also the non-statutory Code on Open-ended Fund Companies (OFC Code) promulgated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) along with its consultation conclusions on the OFC Rules.

The legal framework has now been finally and fully put in place to offer the open-ended fund company (OFC) as an alternative fund vehicle for Hong Kong domiciled funds, with the policy objective to bolster Hong Kong as a full-service asset management hub.

In this legal update, we set out our take on the new available fund vehicle and its likely impact on the funds market, together with an overview of the key requirements:

[1] (i) the Securities and Futures (Amendment) Ordinance 2016 (Commencement) Notice (the Commencement Notice); (ii) the Securities and Futures (Open-ended Fund Companies) Rules (the OFC Rules); and (iii) the Securities and Futures (Open-ended Fund Companies) (Fees) Regulation (the Fees Regulation).

Rapid Expansion to Foreign Participation in China Financial Sectors

Since China became a member of the World Trade Organisation in December 2001 and began developing links to the world economy, the liberalisation of the China financial sectors has been key, as well as the orderly relaxation of foreign exchange and capital controls.  While the opening up of banking industry, securities companies, fund management company and insurance sectors have been carefully paced over the past decade, recent announcements of China’s commitment on further opening up are bringing about the most rapid and widest opportunities for foreign participation.

For banking sector:

  • From 30 June 2018, the limit on foreign ownership in commercial banks is removed, and equal treatment shall be given for foreign-invested banks and domestic banks. In addition, foreign banks shall be permitted to open both subsidiary and branches in China. The limit on foreign ownership in asset management companies is removed, and equal treatment shall be given for foreign-invested and domestic entities (this refers to the institutions for the management of non-performing loans and distressed assets in China banking sector).
  • From 31 December 2018, the business scope of foreign-invested banks shall be substantially expanded, and there shall be no foreign ownership limit in financial assets investment companies or wealth management companies newly established by commercial banks.  Foreign investments shall be encouraged in other banking & finance institutions, including trust companies, financial leasing companies, auto-finance, currency brokerage and consumer finance.

For securities, futures and fund management industries:

  • Targeted to be in place by 30 June 2018, the limit on foreign ownership in securities companies, futures companies as well as fund management companies shall be raised to 51%, and shall be completely removed after 3 years. Sino-foreign joint venture securities companies shall no longer be subject to the requirement of having at least one Chinese securities firm as a domestic shareholder.
  • Targeted to be in place by 31 December 2018, the restrictions on the scope of business of sion-foreign joint venture securities firms shall be removed, and there shall be level-playing field for foreign-invested and domestic institutions.  This is a significant development long waited by foreign investment banks and securities brokerage firms for the potential prospects of full participation in China securities and capital markets.

For insurance sectors:

  • Targeted to be in place by 30 June 2018, the foreign investment limit on investment in life insurance companies shall be raised to 51%.  The restrictions on the business scope of foreign-invested insurance brokerage firms shall be removed, to create level-playing field for foreign-invested and domestic firms.  Eligible foreign investors shall be permitted to operate insurance appraisal business or insurance agency business in Mainland China.
  • Targeted to be in place by 31 December 2018, foreign insurance companies shall no longer be required to establish a representative office in China before setting up foreign-invested insurance companies.

Cross-border markets access is also significantly expanded, with the permitted daily quota of the Mainland-Hong Kong Stock Connect quadrupled from 1 May 2018. London-Shanghai Connect is to be established within 2018.   In addition, the macro-prudential management of the “qualified domestic institutional investors” (QDII) framework for outbound investment in international markets shall be further developed. While details on this are still not available, this carries the potential that QDII and quota restrictions would be relaxed and more quota available soon.

With the wealth of experience of our lawyers on Mainland China financial sectors and cross-markets investments, we look forward to advising on the opportunities on offer, together with our network of China law firm partners.

For print version of this update:

香港公司备存重要控制人登记册

《2018 年公司(修订)条例》(以下称《修订条例》) 将于 2018 年 3 月 1 日起生效。在新规定下所有香港公司须以中文或英文备存重要控制人登记册,以供执法人员在提出要求后查阅。公司注册处为此发出《公司备存重要控制人登记册指引》(以下称《指引》),就重要控制人登记册新规定(以下称《新规定》) 提供其运作的详细指引。

所有在香港成立及注册之公司(除在香港交易所上市的公司外) 均须备存重要控制人登记册, 而该登记册须包含以下资料:(i) 公司重要控制人的所需详情,及(ii)公司指定代表的名字及联系方式。并非在香港成立的公司(包括根据香港法例第622章 《公司条例》在香港注册的非香港公司)无需备存重要控制人登记册。

本最新法律资料旨在介绍一些关键新规定及列出香港公司需采取的一些关键行动(指引刊载了更详尽的运作细节):

Significant Controllers Register

The Companies (Amendments) Ordinance 2018 will enter into force as of 1 March 2018, under which companies in Hong Kong are required to keep and maintain a significant controllers register (“SCR”), either in English or Chinese, for inspection by competent authorities upon demand. The Companies Registry has published a “Guideline on the Keeping of Significant Controllers Registers by Companies” (the “Guideline”) with detailed guidance on the new requirements in relation to the SCR (the “SCR requirements”).

All companies incorporated and registered in Hong Kong (except companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong) should maintain a SCR, containing (i) the required particulars of a company’s significant controller(s) and (ii) name and contact details of a designated representative. Companies not incorporated in Hong Kong (including ‘registered non-Hong Kong companies’ as defined under the Companies Ordinance, Cap.622) are not required to maintain a SCR.

Our legal update highlights certain key SCR requirements and lists out certain key actions to be taken by Hong Kong companies (more operational details are set out in the Guideline):

Revised GEM & Main Board Listing Rules effective 15 February 2018

The conclusions of the consultation (the “Consultation Conclusions”) on review of the position of the Growth Enterprise Market (“GEM”) and changes to the GEM and Main Board Listing Rules (collectively, the “Listing Rules”) was published on 15 December 2017. Having considered the views of respondents, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong decided to adopt substantially all the proposed amendments to the Listing Rules.

The revised rules took effect from 15 February 2018.  In this legal update, we provide a summary of the changes and revised rules made under the Consultation Conclusions:

Way Forward for Hong Kong Listing Regime Changes

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the Exchange) on Friday, 15 December 2017, announced the conclusions to the New Board Concept Paper (Concept Paper) published on 16 June 2017.

On the same day,  the consultation conclusions on the Consultation Paper on the Review of the Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) and Changes to the GEM and Main Board Listing Rules (GEM Consultation Paper) were also published.

Together, these would bring new important changes to Hong Kong’s listing regime, especially including measures to facilitate listings of companies from emerging and innovative sectors, and aimed to enhance Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a global financial centre.

As announced by the Exchange on its official website:

The Exchange has determined to proceed to expand the existing listing regime by introducing two new chapters to the Main Board Listing Rules to allow the listing of (i) Biotech issuers which are pre-profit / pre-revenue; and (ii) issuers from emerging and innovative sectors that have weighted voting rights (WVR) structures, subject to additional disclosure and safeguards.

Companies with WVR structures would be required to have a minimum expected market capitalisation of $10 billion and, if below $40 billion of market capitalisation, would need to meet a higher revenue test of $1 billion in the full financial year before listing. Pre-revenue companies listing under the new Biotech chapter would be required to have a minimum expected market capitalisation of $1.5 billion.

Detailed proposed amendments to the existing Listing Rules for the implementation of the changes are expected to be available for consultation in the first quarter of 2018, with anticipation to have the market ready by second half of 2018 for more innovative companies choose Hong Kong as listing destination.

HKEX’s official news release contains further information on the proposals and way forward.

Hong Kong to introduce Investor ID model for Stock Connect Northbound trades

On 30 November 2017 the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) announced that an agreement has been reached with China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) on proposals to introduce an investor identification model for Northbound trading under the Mainland – Hong Kong Stock Connect[1] (“Investor ID Model”).  Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Limited (“HKEX”) also published an Information Paper, a circular, a FAQ and had arranged a Briefing to Participants on Northbound Investor ID Model.

In the SFC announcement, it was expressed that the Investor ID Model is critical to safeguard market integrity and to strengthen the protection of investors in both markets, and that the SFC also aims to implement an investor identification regime to cover all trading on the SEHK in the longer term.

This Legal Update is intended to shed some light on the key features of Investor ID Model with a particular focus on its implications on asset management companies:

For more operational details of the Investor ID Model please refer to HKEX’s Information Paper and FAQ. [1] Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, both provide for mutual stock market access between Hong Kong and the Mainland.

 [1] Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, both provide for mutual stock market access between Hong Kong and the Mainland.